JISC e-Learning Webinars: Making Assessment Count

Friday 3rd February 2012 1-2pm

Online via Blackboard Collaborate

Presenters: Professor Peter Chatterton (Daedalus e-World Ltd) and Professor Gunter Saunders (University of Westminster)

The objective of Making Assessment Count is primarily to help students engage more closely with the assessment process, either at the stage where they are addressing an assignment or at the stage when they receive feedback on a completed assignment. In addition an underlying theme of MAC is to use technology to help connect student reflections on their assessment with their tutors. To facilitate the reflection aspect of MAC a web based tool called e-Reflect is often used. This tool enables the authoring of self-review questionnaires by tutors for students. On completion of an e-Reflect questionnaire a report is generated for the student containing responses that are linked to the options the student selected on the questionnaire.

The session will provide an overview of MAC and highlight some of the variant MAC processes that are being developed by six different universities, as well as drawing out strengths and weaknesses of MAC. There will be a demonstration of how the e-Reflect tool works but the presenters will also show how MAC can work without that tool.  Participants will be engaged by seeking their views on the affordances offered by MAC as well as their input into identifying barriers and enablers in applying MAC in their own institutional and subject contexts.

The webinar is free to attend.

The Webinar

Joined about 20 minutes into the event after teaching ‘Social Media for Job Hunting‘. Thanks to @sarahknight for sending me the login details which hadn’t arrived! 

MACE: https://sites.google.com/a/staff.westminster.ac.uk/mace/home

Immediate reaction from staff is that the workload is likely to be high re learning journals, but find that a few comments actually doesn’t take that long, especially in comparison to the improvement demonstrated from students.

Offers the opportunity for small, but detailed, positive feedback suggesting actions… rather than “So..?” as a typical written comment on an assignment.

What should the balance be between e & f2f feedback:

My comment:

I’m interested to see how coaching practice, etc. is impacting upon how things work. With manipulating-media.co.uk we give them ‘consultancy sessions’ as a group as feedforward, before they submit their assignments, and they write reflective blog post every week. They tend to use FB to connect with each other. Agree that we should look at the e, but ultimately it’s about ensuring that it meets the needs of the course.

Some chat comments:

  • The record of what everyone says is increasingly important, a big advantage of ‘e’.
  • Is dialogue about scaffolding or about generating cognitive conflict? different processes and different models of dialogue; is all dialogue equally productive?
  • Awarding micro grades for demonstrating action on feedback

Further links:

#JISCEL11: David Puttnam: Towards a Digital Pedagogy

Here’s my ‘live notes’ from David Puttnam’s opening keynote for the JISC Online Conference:

Old fashioned concept of ‘wisdom’ has disappeared., as e.g. we have ‘professional’ politicians, who’ve experienced nothing else.

Creative advisor in China re digital industries. Started with 5000 years of Chinese history used to set the context for the next 10 days, in order to ensure that the mistakes of history were not repeated.

We’re becoming too complacent, as Chinese not just producing low cost goods, but large numbers of cultural outputs. Renewed investment in ICT and Education are core to ensuring that remain relevant to modern society.

Creativity – builds on history, experience, social needs of the society.

We’ve been looking to the West for inspiration for too long, whereas we should have been looking to the East, whereas those of us thinking we can ignore it living in a fantasy world.

Oxford Economics Report (6 weeks ago) for most stats.

Digital developments. 1911 – a lesson then would be entirely recognizable today – as technology has not been allowed to make changes to pedagogy that it should.

Mind, Brain and Education – studies on absorption, retention & application of knowledge. We wouldn’t go to visit a Dr who we didn’t think was up to date with the latest developments, but within education, few are prepared to engage with the digital world in the way that many (younger) have already experienced – hence why we have lost trust of the 16 year olds, etc.

Debate – digital natives, etc…

Dangerous to think that formal learning is the only way – why are making such heavy weather of technology, when most carry them everyday in their pocket.

robbiepixelman: Students are not just learners but collaborators and facilitators of their own learning, and can often learn at a faster / more effective manner than ‘traditional’ teaching can provide. I think we need to recognise and develop the ‘learner’ as the central focus and contributor to peer learning.

David Kernohan: Not sure we need a digital pedagogy so much as a pedagogy. If we properly understood how and why learning happens we could use technology in a thoughtful way to enhance this.

Education needs proper investment, with staff given PAID time every year to develop appropriate skills (pedagogy/technology).

We need a world class education system to inform world class NHS, pensions, etc – the reverse can’t be possible. Where are the leaders in modern day education? The issues that students are protesting about are not just student issues, but e.g. the irrelevance of much of modern day education.

Digital – ability to use entire suite of assets (video, audio, text, etc.) – the ability to use each tool for the right issue… Students do much informal learning, how do we help them make the most of this?

HelenBeetham: ‘Digital pedagogy’ is perhaps the range of pedagogies we need in a digital age – not a special approach.

Younger generation – the notion of being articulate is not necessarily ‘mainstream’.

Lindsay Jordan: Practice what we preach as educational developers – stop trying to ‘tell’ people what to do. Show them. Conceal the message in the medium.

Sally Graham: Yes we’re often simply using technology to tell and to test!!

Sarah Ashley: Slowly and surely wins the race, I think you have to ease teachers/learner into change, don’t go in full throttle throwing your weight around. Perhaps suggest one small change, and facilitate this, help them as much as possible, then other things will come. What we also forget is teachers are very busy and so it has to be small steps, which are less timely.

HelenBeetham: @MaryAnn yes but when to teaching staff have time to reflect in a scholarly way on their own ideological/pedagogical position Sometimes technology can help with that self-recognition by giving new ways of thinking/seeing

David Baume: “If you think education is expensive, try ignorance.

Clare Killen: Learners don’t necessarily want to be called customers or consumers – some feel this denies their role as co-developers/collaborators in their own learning is expensive, try ignorance.”

Huge problem of changing the notion of students from ‘collaborators in learning’ to ‘customers’ with ‘rights’. Also an issue with the government thinking that a current elite group of universities will be enough to get the British to sail into the future.

Your job is to provide compelling content, and scream if don’t have the tools to complete the job.

Looking forward to @AaronPorter talk tomorrow re value of higher education.

http://twapperkeeper.com/hashtag/jiscel11

Seize the global day @timeshighered #altc2011

Global (http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1358287)We live in a connected global environment, Graeme Harper says, so why does the sector act like it’s 1911, not 2011?

A really interesting post, which identifies with the paper that John Naughton gave at ALTC2011. Is the HE sector in danger of making itself redundant?

In higher education, you would think this would often determine our activities and institutions’ formal policies regarding teaching and research. Given that the sector is meant to be the site of educated leadership, that would make perfect, appropriate sense. However, in so many instances this turns out not to be the case. What we find instead are outmoded, outdated, inward-looking policies that suggest not a higher purpose to what we are doing, but rather a determination to support systems of nation-state education and exchange that do not match the world we are living in and that deny the interconnected daily exchanges with which most of us are now so familiar.

Such a statement is, of course, a generalisation: undeniably there are instances of higher education institutions embracing the 21st-century global. But why then do we continue to deliver so much university education as if much of the world were not linkable 24/7 by contemporary technology? Why have we built entire campuses in other parts of the world to export what are largely national attitudes to higher education? Is this purely market opportunism, or do the imperialist overtones hide something more altruistic, more humanly valuable? Regardless, is any of this the best we can do to lead the world in delivering the most advanced forms of education?

Worth reading the full story.

Twitter can improve student performance, study says

Twitter can play role in higher attainment and better engagement, study finds. Sarah Cunnane reports

The sight of students fiddling with their mobile phones and laptops as they tweet their way through lectures is enough to drive many academics up the wall.

But according to a study at Lock Haven University in the US, tweeting could be used to improve academic performance.

Rey Junco, associate professor in the department of academic development and counselling, assessed the impact of using Twitter as a teaching tool on students taking a pre-health course at the institution, which is a member of the Pennsylvania state system.

Separating the students into two groups, he asked one to use the social-networking site Ning to communicate with lecturers while the other used Twitter.

According to a paper published in the Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, titled “The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades”, the latter group scored on average a grade higher than their counterparts.

Read full article, originally entitled ‘The tweet taste of success: social media’s grade effect’.

An Evening With Sir Ken Robinson (16th March 2011)

“Asking if there’s enough creativity in schools is like asking if there’s enough education in schools.  Promoting creativity in all its forms should be one of the fundamental purposes of all schools. Ten years ago in All Our Futures we made a distinction between ‘teaching creatively’ and ‘teaching for creativity’. The first is about teachers using their own creative abilities to inspire and engage pupils in what they’re teaching. The second is about developing pupils’ own imaginations, creative skills and powers of original thought. As recent reports on Creative Partnerships have shown, the evidence is that when schools embrace creative education in both senses, pupils are more engaged in education, teacher morale is greater and achievement rises across the board. For all these reasons, there can never be enough creativity in schools. Or enough education.”

See: EventBrite for tickets and more information. I’m tempted but…

Are Universities aware of open-learning models?

“Open learning and new technology are about to smash the structure of the modern university – and higher education is too distracted by its funding problems to notice.

Peter Smith, the senior vice-president of academic strategies and development for private US firm Kaplan Higher Education, said online access to university courses would end the model of higher education based on “scarcity” of places.

“Faculty and people who run universities are no longer in control,” he told an Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development conference in Paris last week.

Dr Smith, a former assistant director general for education at Unesco, the UN cultural and educational body, challenged the focus on the financial crisis at the event, titled Higher Education in a World Changed Utterly: Doing More with Less.

Given huge growth in access to information, Dr Smith argued, the real challenge facing universities is “doing more with more”. He added: “The only ‘less’ is the resources available to traditional universities to do what they have always done.”

Read full story.

Be different, be (s)quids in

An article in the Times Higher Ed which could be interesting for our chapter

“Rather than focus on thinking, we have tended to play safe and stick to teaching the facts. But recent technology has devalued the learning of facts as they can now be acquired so easily, at the click of a button on your smartphone. Lecturers and professors were once cradles (or is it graveyards?) of facts and our job was to convey those facts from our brains into the brains of our undergraduates. But this is outmoded. When I mark tutorial essays or coursework for example, I rarely encounter factual errors – instead I am faced with garbled writing, incomprehension and an inability to place those easily acquired facts into a coherent framework.”

“They’re, Their, There” – so true… build the skills!

The UK sector should tackle undergraduates’ poor written English via a nationally prescribed update of the US model, urges Alex Baratta

Getting undergraduates to enjoy academic writing is a bit like getting a child to eat liver. First-year university students are usually more interested in content-based classes than skills-based instruction. But while they may see academic writing as boring, it is nonetheless a valuable and necessary skill for them to master, as the academic essay is still one of the main tools of their assessment.

Recent surveys have shown that employers consider proficiency in speaking and writing to be the most desirable skills for graduates to possess. A 2008 report for the Council for Industry and Higher Education, Graduate Employability: What Do Employers Think and Want?, found that 86 per cent of employers consider good communication skills to be important, yet many are dissatisfied with graduates’ ability to express themselves effectively.

It is all too often the case that students enter the job market armed with a BA degree, but still unable to distinguish between “its” and “it’s”, not to mention “there”, “their” and “they’re”. While relatively “minor” errors such as these may not prevent an essay being awarded a 2:2, the possibility remains that the same errors in the context of a cover letter could result in being passed over for a job interview, especially in the current job climate.

Read full story in Times Higher Education, and see how we’re planning to tackle this in Media Studies at the University of Winchester. I am also working on a project called “SkillsNet” which is expected to go live (largely internally) before the academic year commences – this will make skills-based information much easier to access for students, 24-7 online, rather than during the working day – the students are really enthusiastic about this idea.

Sceptics start to see the other side of Second Life

Study finds virtual learning environments taking off despite dogged hostility. Hannah Fearn reports

Hostility between academics who advocate teaching through virtual worlds and those who scorn the idea is being blamed for holding back the evolution of higher education.

The warning comes despite evidence that universities are slowly embracing virtual environments such as Second Life for teaching, according to a report from the Virtual World Watch consultancy.

The report, Zen and the Art of Avatar Maintenance, says that like the two characters in Robert M. Pirsig’s 1974 book Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, academics hold polarised views of learning online.

“Some people take to it with great enthusiasm; others recoil in dismay, horror or anger,” writes the study’s author, John Kirriemuir.

Enthusiasts do more than welcome the chance to work in a virtual world, they embrace their avatar, or online alter ego, and dress it up in new costumes and designs.

Read full story

Social Software for Learning, #pelc10

Social Software for learning – definition…

  • Do we need it or is it fancy hype?
  • How do we use it?
  • What are the apps of the future?

The Theory

Most of us use it every day without even realising it…e.g. Facebook

Social software treat triads of people differently than pairs… needs more collaboration features…

Social software treats groups as first class objects in the system – more important than individuals

Richter and Koch, 2007

So, what now…

  • 3 types
  • ID & Network management – rep of users & their ties within the internet
  • Communication – enable management of comms between users
  • Info management?  find, rate & manage online contents.
  • [Practika – add delicious to Twitter, etc.]
  • Is it new? what has changed? Much communication was 1-2-1 (telephone/letters), whereas radio/newspapers (1-many), now many-many
  • Is social important?
  • Attention – common & selective
  • Emotion – better memory with attachment (e.g. remember Twin Towers, not everyday activities – also a shared/common experience)
  • Possible online – to get emotionally attached when not even here – online emotionally
  • Motivation – cannot be created, but be supported…
  • Community – medically important & part of human nature.
  • Community – the most powerful factor affecting learning.
  • Structures of motivation and rewarding within the human brain are activated during cooperative behaviour.
  • Scientifically proven t0 improve brain strength
  • #Social Software supports searching and finding information from learners – can ask the network…
  • Enables learners to contribute personal expereinces & opinions to formal learning content
  • Emails not adequate medium for comms & knowledge exchange
  • Knowledge can’t always be formalised in docs. (e.g. phones, rarely learn through manual, but through learning from others who already know how to do it…)
  • Communication not document management – best info silo can’t solve most of the described info problems… ‘real’ experts not able to formalise their exetensive knowledge…
  • Learner Preferences – creator, analyst, perceptor, organiser, constructor, ?
  • Augmented Reality – “layer” (using geolocation – e.g. picks up tag clouds from surrounded Twitter account, etc.)

Augmented Reality – VFX Breakdown from soryn on Vimeo.

Video linked to by @jamesclay in session.

  • WikiTube
  • Facedetection
  • Autotagging of photos
  • Voice detection (good for disabilites)
  • Time in virtual form
  • WILD wireless interaction learning device – mobile device to students, students indicate too fast/slow/don’t understand, polls, etc.
  • CoCoMa
  • Social Network Visualisation – Facebook plugin
  • www.gapminder.org rescale data visually
  • Serious games 0 e.g darfurisdying.com
  • Friend Mapper – just locates those people who you are connected with…