Learning Journeys: A Webinar (@JISC)

What follows are my rough notes from the session:

‘A cast of thousands’

Explaining concepts – having them in one place… all digital literacies across the institution tied in with Learning Objects. Thought others would like this, so used materials from the OER community.

Brought in from RLO, CETL. Learnt a lot from JISC LLiDA

Taught students how to use them via the VLE – not f2f tutor time. 

Customize Learning Objects particular to our institution.

Used Peter Knight, Diana Laurillard, Wenger, e-moderating – in stages…

Example of weekly activity – pedagogic – designed by Diana Laurillard… (across the subject…)

How offer the information in a meaningful way – support their pace of learning. Put a tutor in their pocket rather than 24/7 on an email… Interactive Learning Objects… designed to be used across the sector.

Where didn’t reach agreement of a shared understanding, didn’t seek to create one – focused on the areas where is agreement.

Student digital skills had increased – but difficult to isolate impact from what they would already have learnt without ‘Learner Journey’

Based around sound educational principles.  Digital literacy skills – they need to recognize that they can learn from each other…. Made a huge difference…

This module is the start to the journey – then they’re expected to go and build upon that.

Happy to make skills/PDP module more widely available – took about 10 years to reach this point. The students progress well with it.

Re: staff – they get thrown into the module with the students and get up to speed by being immersed in it with the students. Always have experienced tutors in there with the students. Make them failsafe for students, often works well for staff! Allows interesting forum/discussion area.

Different levels of engagement from staff, with varying degrees of success … once they’ve had a go may be interested in using for their own modules as so easy to use.

Digital literacy can boost employability and improve student experience #jiscdiglit

I am working on the JISC Digital Literacies programme with the Organisational Development in Higher Education Group. We are featured in The Guardian today: 

It starts as follows:

The nature of knowledge is changing and, in this digital age, our definition of basic literacy urgently needs expanding. With an estimated 90% of UK jobs requiring some level of IT competency, the notion of digital literacy – those capabilities that equip an individual for living, learning and working in a digital society – is one that needs to be taken seriously by colleges and universities.

We live in an online world with the digital divide closing up both through government initiatives (Martha Lane Fox, the government’s digital champion, recently took up the challenge of getting 10 million people in the UK online, saying that otherwise “they will be even more isolated and disadvantaged as government and industry expand ever faster into digital-only services”) and technological advances – more than half the UK population now own a smartphone with internet capability.

Universities and colleges have a responsibility to develop students into individuals who can thrive in an era of digital information and communication – those who are digitally literate are more likely to be economically secure and these skills are especially important in higher education given that graduate white collar jobs are almost entirely performed on computers and portable devices.

But it’s not just about employability – increasingly digital literacy is vital for learning itself. Digital tools such as virtual learning environments, e-portfolios and social networking software for peer mentoring are now common within further and higher education and students without the skills to navigate them risk suffering an inferior student experience at best, and being left completely behind at worst. It goes beyond IT skills, a complete culture change is required to live fully within the modern digital society, from understanding how to communicate ideas effectively in a range of media to managing digital reputation and history.

Read full story.

Digital Visitors & Residents with @daveowhite #JISC

My live notes from the webinar this afternoon:

http://tallblog.conted.ox.ac.uk/index.php/2009/10/14/visitors-residents-the-video/

http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3171/3049

Dave White

Visitor = sees the web as a set of tools

Residents = sees the web as a space

It’s about motivation to engage, rather than a skills set, e.g. when people want to talk to their grandchildren, they use Skype very quickly.

Can you be a lurker as a visitor AND a resident?

More likely to be successful in formal education if you take a visitor approach.

Lynn Connaway

 

Questions asked: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ukO43zTuOK2A7dqAIOdMrdtE7sGZusH87wZEca1dS3c/edit?pli=1 

Codebook: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GB8ZxTY2TRsan-H6aunrQP4gC2o63NANKg7e3vkc61o/edit

Lurking often gets defined as within one platform, but someone may be quiet on e.g. a forum, but take that data and be ‘loud’ with it on Twitter, etc.

Difference between confidence in the technology, and the confidence to engage with the topic being discussed (Î think this is what we often see with students)

Email: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16055310? (see also: http://scottbw.wordpress.com/2011/12/07/revolutionary-messaging-technology-will-challenge-fb-twitter-im/).

PBWorks http://jiscdesignstudio.pbworks.com/w/page/40474566/JISC-Digital-Literacy-Workshop-materials

Dave White

https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_sfm89i9DC9NmI5ZmU2ZDItZDI3Zi00MzVmLWIzMDQtOGE5ZWRkZDJkOTYx&hl=en_GB&pli=1

See: student very ‘resident’ in their social life, but in their formal study, they are more of a ‘visitor’ …

https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_sfm89i9DC9NmI5ZmU2ZDItZDI3Zi00MzVmLWIzMDQtOGE5ZWRkZDJkOTYx&hl=en_GB

It’s possible to be a rounded, sociable human being without being in Twitter all the time!

Raising question as to whether this is a continuum, or whether there’s a range of factors which affect practice and behavior.

Not necessarily trying to turn everybody into a Resident, although that could be valuable.

amber thomas 2:30 PM
A thought rather than a question. dave says this is not about turning everyone into a resident. i think thats really important … in ed tech world we tend to see a continiuum and assume we need to change where people are on it.
Andy Powell 2 2:29 PM
@doug i don’t understand ‘resident’ vs. ‘visitor’ as being a ‘fun’ vs. ‘drudgery’ thing
Doug Belshaw 2:31 PM
@Andy If you can ‘play’ with something then you understand it. Surely?

How much of our behavior online is factored in by ‘stable personality traits’ and how much by the environment that we’re in.

To read: http://process.arts.ac.uk/content/cognitive-capitalism

Do you become more of a ‘legitimate’ ‘resident’ by becoming a participant – are you consuming or creating knowledge?

This is not supposed to be a theory for everything, this is specifically about ‘technology for learning’.

Lynn Conway

Sources students use

Wikipedia is popular… went off into a debate about ‘fear of Wikipedia’, and how much of this group see it as an acceptable first port of call, and to demonstrate to students the ‘contestation of knowledge’.

12-18 year olds: screenagers – said ‘emails are for old people’

http://www.conceptlinkage.org/

Dave White 

We talk a lot about OERs, but what about ‘Open Educational Answers’.

Is education about the answers, or the process that it takes us to reach the answers?

Academic institutions have to accept that people ARE using Wikipedia all the time.  (Slide from Martin…)

If we keep setting homework which is ‘a short essay supported by verifiable sources’ – then Wikipedia provides the answers – we need to think about the assignments, etc we set.

iilan soon @xlearn 2:49 PM
I think in primary schools, they encourage process, then they kill this enquiry off in secondary school

If education is about getting the answers, and all answers are a couple of clicks away – what does that mean for education? Does education/homework need to contextualize/personalize the information more…

Education is about questions. The web is about answers. Does education then require ‘co-creation’? Need to look at tools such as http://peerwise.cs.auckland.ac.nz/… help students ask the questions.

The Learning Black Market : http://tallblog.conted.ox.ac.uk/index.php/2011/09/30/the-learning-black-market/

sui fai john mak 2:55 PM
Education is about enculturating learners into the knowledge-creating civilization and to help them find a place in it. This is where institutions need to work on. Comments?

Questions

http://teachingcollegemath.com/2010/11/what-is-socrait/

http://www.jisc.ac.uk/learnerexperience

http://projectinfolit.org/st/rheingold.asp

Amber: How do we move forward from guidance on ‘it depends’ on your learners, etc? What are the chances of providing a digital environment that all are comfortable with … we need to be comfortable with the idea that some will be resident, and some won’t. “One size fits no one”.

Some areas are ‘energy efficient’ – we’ve put lots of effort into ‘resident institutional approaches’ where interesting learning can take place, but not always helpful – e.g. students set up own Facebook group – they can get on with that.

Andy Powell 2 3:00 PM
we want people to become residents but we don’t have to build all their houses

What is the student motivation to encourage should be focused upon, rather than worrying about the tools that they are using.

Doug Belshaw 3:01 PM
Do we need some social housing for new Residents?

Or affordable housing?

Brenda Kaulback 3:02 PM
Can residents have many homes?

I thought this was a nice way to end: “perhaps residents should always have the kettle on and a nice plate of biscuits mmmm biscuits”

Turn it on to turn them off or turn it off to keep their attention (@adamrsc) #JISC

http://www.istockphoto.com/stock-photo-17233306-smartphone-apps.php?st=929cc7bI have just participated in this very useful webinar on the use of mobile technology in the classroom with @adamrsc, and am even more keen to interview American Studies at the University of Winchester as they have been experimenting with encouraging the use of mobile devices in the classroom, and the feedback is generally positive. Below are my live notes from the session:

Mobile phones have no place in a learning space because all students do is misuse them to update their social media spaces?

  • Yes, lots do this, but this is more to do with how we engage students with their mobile devices.
  • 100% Senior Management found that they were useful oso it was how they use the devices.

Mobile phones disrupt classroom behaviour?

  • Isolated knowledge/skills with students – rather than addressing corporate change, and the need to address student behaviours.  Cultural change – if don’t address all those areas, nothing moves forward.
  • You manage how students use pen and paper in the classroom, and in the same way it can be a disruptive device (as mobile phones)

Mobile phones have not been shown to have any benefit for learning?

  • Graph demonstrates that there are significant effects on learning – National colleges – Fig 17/18 with/without mobile devices.
  • All research demonstrates that it can enhance learning if used well.

Equal access: are you advantaging the many or disadvantaging the  few?

  • Provide materials via mobile devices that enhance  the other materials (rather than only via mobile devices), in the same way that you would change your teaching style to meet different learning needs.

Who pays for the PAYG devices?

  • Use own devices/learning devices. Offer wireless network for student use.

Can this improvement be attributed to mobile devices?

  • Run with control groups, but not ‘overly scientific’ – but the weight of evidence rather than scientific rigour, that is useful.

Staff Development: Takes too long to learn how to use the technology effectively?

  • Can take time from scratch, and may not be time-efficient for institutions from scratch, but the best CPD would be to purchase one yourself, and it becomes an everyday device as pen and paper.

Manage safeguarding, where a student is showing the latest violent movie, etc.?

  • Ties in with safeguarding policies, same as windows/stairs, etc…
  • Need clear induction policies in which the ways these tools are used is outlined.

It costs a lot of money to invest in new trends – what makes mobile devices different?

  • More to do with the behavior of people, and how they use it.
  • If we’re talking about using resources effectively, the mobile phone is one of the most resource-efficient devices you can use – most more powerful than PCs … which brings in overhead fees for IT maintenance – if we had strategies for students using own devices in classrooms effectively – then the cost issue disappears.

Financial advantages, but what about security implications, if tied into an institutional network?

  • No security issues by using Google docs, etc. Revision notes in e.g. StudyStacks.
  • Can use if wifi networks are kept security free and separate from other networks.

How can we train staff to use these devices when they’re still not using VLES/PowerPoint well?

  • These are not the people who are going to use these devices well initially, have to take responsibility with own devices – preferably provided by institution – if use as part of daily life – as become familiar, can start to see how can use in the classroom.

Students often do not want their tutors using their social media/texts? How get past that barrier?

  • Lots of (anecdotal) evidence of this, but there is increasing evidence that there is positive engagement via this if using a ‘professional Facebook site’.  Good idea from one student tends to get picked up by other students.

A good space to get educational apps?

  • No generic site that lists good educational resources … Twitter does it fairly well in an ad hoc way. Android Marketplace – search.

Who drives the choice of devices?

  • Has to be driven by the students, can’t specify a particular device, so would need as an institution a platform independent approach.

Is there a danger that courses will be distorted to provide content that suits the mobile phone?

  • This tends to be to the tutors advantage. Benefits came from courses that were outside based courses, so courses changed in a positive way.

How teachers be supported to learn about different types of mobile devices?

  • Workshops within the organization (could be nice to introduce new staff within a Faculty), or attend JISC webinars, etc. Helps provide case studies.
Further Links
Image purchased from iStockphoto.

#FASTECHUK makes @timeshighered

Winchester/Bath Spa: High-powered feedback loops

Two universities have been awarded almost £200,000 to run a three-year project looking at how to improve the use of technology in student feedback and assessment. The Learning and Teaching Development Unit at the University of Winchester and its counterpart at Bath Spa University were given the money by the IT body Jisc to run the scheme. The project – titled Feedback and Assessment for Students with Technology – is designed to use readily available technologies to enhance assessment and feedback at course, faculty and institutional levels.

See in context, and more information about the project (a website is currently being constructed).

Checking in with #JISCEL11

It’s nearly that time of year again, for the JISC ‘Innovating E-Learning’ conference, a conference which you could attend in your pyjamas if you like.. last year’s event was excellent!

For only £50, there’s the opportunity to listen to a number of experts present about the latest projects in technology enhanced learning, to connect and converse with a number of people.. and this can all fit around other things that you’re doing over the four days of the event.

As a super-delegate, I will be particularly active in the asynchronous forums, particularly important for me, as many of the sessions are ‘live’ at times that I can’t be, but I can listen to the recordings, see what people have already discussed, and then join in the discussions. To get a taster, JISC has an asynchronous radio show, with lots of recordings already in place.

There’s a great range of material. In the ‘Activity Week’ (next week), I’m particularly interested to see what Peerwise is/can do, to see Gradspace (which could complement what we’ve been developing with SkillsNet), practical guidelines for running virtual classrooms and a number of talks on digital literacy and mobile learning.

For the conference itself, I know I can make the opening keynote live ‘Towards a digital pedagogy’, and then it gets a little more difficult, as I’m running a couple of church events (so I KNOW I can’t attend anything live on Thursday), speaking at #digimanc (although I’m seeking space to join in with the closing keynote), running a Survey Monkey workshop and student tutorials. It’s a particularly packed week, and an interesting way of being able to stay engaged!!

Emerging Practice in a Digital Age #altc2011

JISC Emerging practice in a digital age

Emerging & disruptive technologies – a little outside the comfort zone. A little more effort to think about how can use them well in the teaching spaces. What are the implications for supporting them institutionally … And which are students bringing in & need to be thought about.

altc2011 013

Discussion – challenges:

  • Not great support for ‘everyday’ tools let alone disruptive
  • Thinking e,g, phones are just for ‘social’
  • Access (not all have tools)
  • Understanding individual/work tools (blurring) – not wanting to give out nos
  • Seen as gimmick/fad
  • Lack of funding to support – resources
  • Expectations of staff/students in using tools – not all same
  • Lecturers – skills (apparent) time & interest
  • IT department
  • Different devices … What is common?
  • Senior manager ignorance
  • Stability of the technologies
  • Managing change – turning negatives to positives

Drivers for change

  • Increased personalisation and choice
  • New markets
  • £££ pressures (look at new partners)
  • Changing behaviours & emerging benefits
  • Students know what’s out there – rise in social/collaborative learning

Core Challenges

  • Digital literacies
  • Specialist support
  • Leadership & vision
  • Re-engineering structures, strategies & policies

Case Study: Linking learning to location – University Campus Suffolk (Andy Ramsden)

altc2011 014

Using QR codes. Small project to get people do/talk – just get things going to be able to build upon. Low threshold application (he’ll find a URL later … Uses something like Google to create the quiz in the background… See photos). Do self, if works, then can start to talk at a higher level & get IT involved… And people start to come to see what you have done & know you’ve solved other problems so ask about next problem. (See example of a tour)

altc2011 017altc2011 016
Collates answers from a walk outside – then can use the answers to feedback (feedback loop) & fill in the gaps.

In under 150 words – think of teaching & learning applications of this …

  • Exploring your campus for induction
  • Location based – ensure they have to check in/answer a question
  • Give an audio/video feed alongside eg Shakespeare/Chaucer/language
  • Field trip … Treasure hunt
  • Video adventure – find QR codes – changes direction of where go .. Physical spaces (or paper?)
  • Orientation of the lab – show how to use tools (but risk assessment – need physical sign off)
  • Promote awareness e.g. Had students with a task to raise awareness of the alternative vote – encourage them to use…
  • Face painting a QR code on …
  • QR code artwork … (build into uni logo)

See: http://tinypaste.com/788d5

A message to remember

altc2011 018
Lots more in the guide. Organisation has to be the engine that drives things forward. Slides, etc. are here.

This blog entry was written live in session, with photos/headings added afterwards.

Re-imagining Learning #altc2011

altc2011 008

Representing the Curriculum (JISC)

Assuming the slides for these will be online somewhere… Will start on JISC.

Pragmatic vs educational elements of designing the curriculum.

Who are the stakeholders curriculum development (photo)? Are systematic problems in creating new curricula, especially dealing with vague ‘QA’ statements.

altc2011 007

MMU

Corporate IT well removed from learning, don’t understand the job of the university. Produces 8 page doc – causes unrest!! Brought in central name to co-ordinate: http://www.business.mmu.ac.uk/staff/staffdetails.php?uref=2

More stakeholder involvement in curriculum & processes that surrounded it. Clearer story of learning outcomes & fit with employer needs.

City University London (predict)

Exploring design principles for effective delivery, getting the academics more involved in seeing that this isn’t tick-boxing but an effective exercise which communicates outcomes well. Change management processes to allow embedding.

The word ‘curriculum’ means different things to different people. Student programme? What we teach them? Wanted to reach a shared understanding.

Staff started to think about the course more holistically and what the programme philosophy was. Considered what students needed to do. Didn’t badge as ‘yet another project’ but piggybacked on other initiatives within the university so aligned with current uni concerns.

Worked with students – as demonstrated by NUS data – in curriculum design … Practical effects.

Dynamic Learning Maps: Newcastle University

Giving students real choice in how they engage. Promoting cross-module learning, mapping go transferable grad skills.

Map what students should already know – not unintended duplication of material. Interactive & participating environment – distinguish between what’s core curriculum and what’s other.

http://jiscdesignstudio.pbworks.com/w/page/30958301/Dynamic%20Learning%20Maps

altc2011 009

Open University Learning Design Initiative

Complex & challenging processes involving range of stakeholders with different interests. Terms & concepts don’t mean the same thing to everyone. Design is a messy interactive process – different aspects of design focused upon by different users. No ‘one size fits all’ possible.

altc2011 010
More on all this on The Design Studio

Innovating e-Learning 2011: Learning in transition #JISCEL11

I have, once again, been selected as a ‘super-delegate’ for the following conference:

Advanced publicity

The sixth JISC online conference takes place this year on 22-25 November 2011, with pre-conference activities running from 15 November.

The conference is relevant to a wide range of delegates from further and higher education. Register now to explore through live presentations and asynchronous debates some of the latest thinking about the benefits and challenges of enhancing learning and teaching with technology. 

The title of the 2011 conference, Learning in transition, reflects the challenges institutions and practitioners are facing in the fast-changing landscape of post-16 education, including preparing students for employment. Sessions are organised under two themes, each with its own keynote presenter:

  • Learning landscapes explores the potential in technology to forge cross-sector collaboration through which further and higher education institutions, learners and employers can work together to shape a more forward-looking curriculum
  • Navigating pathways opens up some of the challenges involved in learning and teaching in a digital age and discusses potential technology-enhanced solutions

New this year

The conference this year has a distinctly participatory feel with even more live events.  You can take part in a number of ways:

  • Register at www.jisc.ac.uk/elpconference11
  • Contribute to the pre-conference activity week. Innovations this year include a Pecha Kucha session. To take part, email geoffm@directlearn.co.uk.
  • Try out new tools and techniques throughout the pre-conference week
  • Share your reflections as the conference unfolds in a designated Thinking Space
  • Participate in live Elluminate® debates
  • Be inspired to contribute to James Clay’s blog, Letters from the Edge
  • Follow the conference on Twitter @ jiscel2011
  • Contribute your views on Twitter using #jiscel11

The fee for Innovating e-Learning 2011 remains unchanged at £50. Don’t wait – book now for the best value-for-money conference of its kind!

Effective Assessment in a Digital Age Workshops @jisc

From challenge to change…

Using principles of good practice, work with colleagues towards an effective model for the use of technology in assessment and feedback.

A series of free workshops based around the JISC Effective Assessment in a Digital Age publication and associated online resources will take place during January – March 2011. Workshops will be held in London (20 January 2011), Birmingham (16th February 2011), Bristol (March 2011, date to be confirmed) and Newcastle (24 March 2011). The JISC e-Learning Programme will be working in partnership with the JISC Regional Support Centres on these events.

These workshops will be exploring how the use of technology in HE and HE in FE, linked to principles of good practice in assessment and feedback, can help promote more effective learning. These workshops, which draw on the work of recent JISC-funded projects as well as related significant developments in the area of assessment, will have a practical, hands-on flavour with a focus on how to move from current challenges towards sustainable change.

The workshops will be suitable for:

  • Lecturers, tutors and course leaders who design assessment and feedback for their learners on HE-level courses
  • Intermediaries with a role in supporting practitioners with assessment, and technology-enhanced assessment (learning technologists, e-learning/ILT champions, staff developers, educational developers, academic registry)

Further information together with the registration form for the London workshop is now available from www.jisc.ac.uk/assessworkshops

Original copy: @jamesclay