CALLS FOR SUBMISSIONS FOR A SPECIAL ISSUE: TEACHING DIGITAL MEDIA

Here’s a journal I wish that I’d been in a position to submit an article to, but my diary is rather stuffed (at least til the end of June!), but I look forward to seeing what is produced…

Deadline: November 30, 2010 Guest Editor: Mary McAleer Balkun

The editors seek articles (5,000-10,000 words) and media essays (overviews on books, film, video, performance, art, music, websites, etc. 3,000 to 5,000 words) and items for an occasional feature, “The Material Culture of Teaching,” that explore the uses of digital media in all pedagogical contexts and disciplinary perspectives.

Submissions should explore the application or impact of any form of digital media on teaching and learning, including but not restricted to digital/digitized materials, specific software, social media, virtual environments, audio or visual media, and the internet.  We welcome essays from all disciplinary and interdisciplinary perspectives. Transformations  publishes only essays that focus on pedagogical praxis and/or pedagogical theory.

Possible topics for pedagogy-related articles:

  • Teaching digital media as a subject
  • Distance Learning
  • Digital texts
  • Mapping software/Social Geography
  • Creation of new knowledge
  • Collaboration
  • Virtual worlds
  • Digital storytelling
  • Unintended consequences of using digital media
  • Authorial/Ownership issue
  • Creative commons
  • Ethics and digital media
  • Access issues
  • Social media/social networking
  • Technologies of plagiarism
  • Libraries in the digital age
  • Email and the historical record
  • Politics of knowledge
  • Globalization and digital media
  • Faculty development
  • Portability of learning materials
  • Censorship/Self censorship
  • Class/race/gender and digital media
  • Digital media and the arts
  • Personal vulnerability in the digital world
  • Creating digital media
  • Immediacy/Ubiquity of information
  • Discipline shifts

Send submissions or inquiries in MLA format (7th ed.) as attachments in MS Word (.doc) or Rich Text format to: Jacqueline Ellis and Ellen Gruber Garvey, Editors, transformations@njcu.edu. Author(s) name and contact information should be included on a SEPARATE page.

See information here.

The iPad – A Game Changer for E-Learning? // Graham Brown-Martin // #jiscel10

The article by Graham Brown Martin prepared for the #jiscel10 conference is fascinating, particularly having reviewed one recently, and finding that others want to use it, but because of the way iTunes works, it has been personalised to me, and I don’t particularly want people being able to use my email, etc. I have picked out some of the sections that particularly stood out for me:

The fact is that the office metaphor doesn’t work anymore, it’s just not relevant to the way most people now wish to see their lives. Why do we need to have a “computer” with an “operating system” that we must master with endless “applications and drivers” to configure and so on? As I wondered out loud in a recent volley on one of the Becta research lists – why do I need a bulky lump of tech with a lardy OS when I just want to surf, write, look and listen? If a computer is really advanced then anyone should be able to use it without any formal training.

This razor blade business model of constantly buying bloated operating systems, massive applications, managed services and an industry that exists to show you how to switch it all on and off has got to be heading for the cemetery.

So can I carry out most of my day to day work using an iPad?…

In a few short weeks I’ve found that my iPad, like a sort of transitional love object, is rarely far from my finger tips. But here lies a new problem. The iPad is intended as a personal device, it’s not easily adaptable for sharing. Friends, family and interested bystanders who want to hold and test the device have access to my private email, social media accounts, etc. There is no “guest account” and from what I understand nothing on the horizon although a printing App is coming soon. If this really is a new, third category of device between the smart phone and the laptop then guest or multiple accounts is a must.

The most surprising aspect of her immediate use of the iPad was an instantaneous understanding of how to operate it without any instruction at all. Of course, she’d had the experience of using Apps on her iPhone but that also required no instruction and the skills were completely transferable but how she used the iPad as a consequence of the size of the screen was different and noticeably better.

Not as qualified… to say how valuable this new device is to the learning and teaching process after all until it’s used as a tool it is just an inanimate piece of tech. It’s usefulness will surely depend upon how it’s deployed

Yet schools in some parts of the country and indeed HHL Girls own school where she is due to join this September are ill-prepared for this generation. They are still preoccupied with interactive white boards, ICT suites, keyboarding skills, learning platforms, educational software that is so boring your grandmother would die using it… Some will be unlucky and will risk being a generation lost to somnambulism at best or Ritalin at worst, accused of being disruptive because they can not contain their desire to learn.

Other stories about the iPad on here (including a review as an educational tool).

12 Essential Teaching Techy Tools @sandrapires

What a great Slideshare presentation, simple ideas of how to use the core tools available to education.

Students ‘let down’ by the academic Luddites

Survey finds that academy is failing to capitalise on new technology. Sarah Cunnane reports

Research from the US Department of Education suggests that students studying online tend to outperform those receiving face-to-face tuition; The Open University in the UK has topped 20 million downloads on iTunes U; and, worldwide, social media has overtaken pornography as the number one activity on the web.

However, recent statistics from the US show that the academy may be failing to capitalise on the potential offered by new technology.

The Faculty Survey of Student Engagement, conducted annually by academics at Indiana University, Bloomington, last year included questions on the use of technology by lecturers for the first time.

The results show that while 72 per cent of respondents used course- management systems such as Blackboard, many did not use any other technology in their academic lives.

Some 70 per cent did not use plagiarism-detection software and 84 per cent did not use blogs. In each case, a small percentage claimed not to know that such things existed.

Read full story in Times Higher Ed.

Learning Cultures

Another interesting piece from Kenneth Fee’s  “Delivering E-Learning“, re the differing types of learning culture (p.29)

Personal Mastery

Creating an environment that encourages the development of personal and organisational goals in partnership with others.

Mental Models

Using visualisation or ‘internal pictures’ to help shape behaviour and decisions.

Shared Vision

Winning group commitment by developing shared images of how the future should look.

Team Learning

Encouraging collective thinking and working, so that a group’s capacity to develop intelligence and ability is greater than the sum of its individual members’ talents.

System Thinking

Developing the ability to see the ‘big picture’ within an organisation, and understanding how changes in one part affect the whole system.

Empowering Learning through the use of E-Tools:

  • They have greater choice over when they start e-learning
  • They can learn at their own pace, at times and in places that suit them
  • They can exercise greater choice over what they study, or at least what they prioritise
  • They can choose the training inputs that best match their learning styles
  • They themselves can contribute inputs to the learning process.
  • They have access to the broadest range of resources, and some of the richest resources at that.
  • And, contrary to conventional wisdom, they should have more opportunities for interaction.

Paul Brett, using students as e-ambassadors #iblc10

Students as Partners in ‘e’ blended learning: can they help us?

Dr Paul Brett, University of Wolverhampton

 

Strategic E/Blended Learning

Widening Participation: 22,000 students, most 1st generation, wide ethnic mix

VLE is widely used, and recently successful in the use of e-portfolio students, with 21,000 students with active engagement.

 

3 x 180 degree changes that need to make:

  • The e-side of the curriculum might better be done by students than staff

  • We might be better off using technologies that are free & not owning the technologies that we do stuff with

  • We need to stop providing kit for students and incentivise students to own & use their own kit.

 

We are never going to keep up with the developments in hardware/software, and the nature of the learning opportunities that those provide.

 

Not harnessing the possibilities fully – so work in partnership with students, rather than trying to OWN it.

 

Changed learning context? 97% children use internet and a majority of those were creating content…

 

When printing press was invented, had to stop orally relating stories, so no need to use those areas of our brain, so those parts of the brain shrunk. Neuroscience – functionality of the brain is changing.

 

Verbal activities & multitasking better, but jury out on critical, reflective faculties… Studies on cognitive processes.

 

Sir David Melville, CLEX – use students to help

 

Knowledge isn’t owned – available to all – possible to PERSONALISE!

If we started from scratch now we wouldn’t start from where we are.

 

Much of blended learning – implies a mode of transmission? Based on an old model?

 

Now – much is ‘shovelware’ – notes & resources – so how much of the power of the web is actually being used?

 

Potential barriers – lack of time, lack of staff knowledge, lack of money, institutional culture – for 8 years have been the same issues. Are we really making the radical differences that we could make? Despite staff/teacher development being funded like no other European country.

 

Students understand better than staff? Is putting a load of data into the VLE really an academic’s job? Work with the students to use the places that students understand with the ‘doing’ of the e-stuff, and what they NEED. Use them to e-support face-to-face options.

 

Flip Camera → Photobucket, etc… Tried this on 3 modules. With student ‘E-Champions’ – had mini interviews with them. VLE, PebblePad – told them to do whatever they thought would help in the learning on the module for their peers. Overall – 2 were a success (the one in Performing Arts less successful)

 

Evaluation of the Project

  • They all set up Facebook groups for their students (focus for 7 types of peer-peer support)
  • Course materials (extra research & extra notes for topics on module where felt was a gap in the teaching, or misunderstandings from the students)
  • Pebble blogs (Place to gather student feedback about issues – going well/not understood; over semester use subsided and it all went into Facebook)
  • Video (but technical issues – largely to do with the video size)
  • Subject Q&A for students (Multiple choice questions on the content that the lecturer was providing).
  • Also functioned as liaison between academic staff/student cohort. Unexpected, but very useful.

Types of peer-peer support (note, “only” 80% of students on the Facebook group)

  • Content creating, extending & sharing
  • Finding new resources
  • Created Learning Activities
  • Filled in Gaps in subject understanding
  • Filled in Gaps in administration understandings
  • Asked colleagues for ideas/issues
  • Mediated between staff and the students on course issues.

 

Student e-Champions

  • Positive:
  • Role was validated – staff & students accepted it
  • Their motivation – to fill in ‘gaps’
  • Became learning leaders amongst their peers
  • Increased their own subject learning by immersion
  • Negative:
  • Engagement from some students = a degree of apathy (to anything)
  • Technical issues
  • More support & time

 

Staff

  • Far richer, deeper feedback, and far more than they would have been able to do on their own.
  • Improved the dialogue & interaction with the students (staff were members of the Facebook groups).
  • Gave resources, dialogue and a window into learning issues.
  • Had concern about the accuracy of data, but overall very positive about it all.

 

Rest of students

  • Very much in favour as extra support
  • A source of INSTANT help (not possible from the tutor)
  • Felt more able to voice concerns to peers than staff
  • Would have liked the videos.

 

Conclusions

  • E-Partnership concept works for STAFF and STUDENTS.
  • Need careful selection of e-champions – fulfilled slightly different roles
  • Was no issue with Facebook
  • Students didn’t really need pedagogic direction & tech support.
  • Students learnt more and staff felt communication channels are opened.

 

Questions – should we be using Moodle or Facebook? Wrong question? Are there great free tools that we should actually be using? Let the students lead the enterprise – maximise Web 2.0 opps, save staff loads, save institutional costs for hardware? Should the role be a credit-bearing one?

Next

  • Longer lead in/selection process
  • Pre-module planning, meet e-champions/staff to map out the e-side.
  • Give the students full support – meetings, etc.

 

QUESTIONS

  • Students paid £75 each in e-tokens. Not all have collected. No stipulation as to what needed to be done. Largely those who were self-motivated.
  • Do you monitor the content? Staff didn’t (as they don’t have time to monitor Wikipedia – which students will go to first!) – don’t have time.
  • Exeter, Students as Change Agents (about to implement e-champions). Ethics of payment, what about those who do better? Credit as a mentoring role, etc.
  • Students probably doing around 4 hours a week…
  • What would you say if students all put the WRONG answer in an exam which is on Facebook? But aside from a ‘health warning’, similar to Wikipedia. Get the students in literate in using web information – evaluate sources as with everything else.
  • Around 50-85 students per module.
  • Did staff NOT use the VLE then? Yes – they gave PPT to the students to do what they want to do with as they like. Students had admin rights for VLE modules – could use if wanted (which they didn’t) – and also a lot of legacy material on there.
  • Take advantage of material that’s already in students technology… Institutions work on a robust wireless network, rather than hardware infrastructure…
  • For Widening Participation – probably cost-neutral, as provide materials for bursary students…  

Recommended Reading for Blended Learning?

Below appears to be the list of texts that the University of Winchester has in its library in relation to Blended (or E-) Learning, and I would be interested to know what more up-to-date texts you have found useful? I’ll be back with more links…

  • Banks, S. Lally, V. & McConnell, D. (2002) Collaborative E-Learning in Higher Education: Issues and Strategies, SPIE Publications
  • Beetham, H. & Sharpe, R. (eds) (2007) Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age : designing and delivering e-learning, Routledge
  • Bielawski, L. and Metcalf, D., (2005). Blended e-Learning – Integrating Knowledge, Performance Support and Online Learning, HRD Press Inc, Amherst, MA, USA
  • Bonk, C.J. and Graham, C.R., (2005).  The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Bull, J & McKenna, C (2003), Blueprint for computer-assisted assessment, Routledge Falmer
  • Burge, E. J. & Haughey, M (2001), Using Learning Technologies, Routledge Falmer
  • Conole, G. and Oliver, M.(ed) (2007), Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: themes, methods and impact on practice, part of the Open and Distance Learning Series, F. Lockwood, (ed), RoutledgeFalmer.
  • Collis, B. & Moonen, J. (2001) Flexible Learning in a Digital World Kogan Page
  • Cross, J. (2007), Informal learning : rediscovering the natural pathways that inspire innovation and performance, John Wiley
  • Evans T. and Nation D. (2000) Changing University Teaching: reflections on creating educational technologies, Kogan Page
  • Garrison, D.R. (2003) E-learning in the 21st century : a framework for research and practice, RoutledgeFalmer
  • Jeffreys, M. (2001) E-learning : strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age, McGraw-Hill
  • Koper, R. and Tattersall, C., (2005). Learning Design: A Handbook on Modelling and Delivering Networked Education and Training, Springer-Verlag,Berlin, Germany.
  • Macdonald, J. (2008) Blended Learning and Online Tutoring: Planning Learning Support and Activity Design, Gower
  • Maier, P. & Warren, A. (2000) Integr@ting Technology in learning and teaching, Kogan Page
  • Mason, R. & Rennie, F.  (2008) E-learning and social networking handbook : resources for higher education Routledge
  • McConnell, D. (2000) Implementing Computer Supported Cooperative Learning, Kogan Page
  • Murphy,D, Walker, R. & Webb, G. (2001) Online Learning & Teaching with Technology Kogan Page
  • Rice, W.H. (2006) Moodle : e-learning course development : a complete guide to successful learning using Moodle Packt
  • Salmon, G. (2000) E-Moderating: the Key to Learning & Teaching On-line, London, Kogan Page
  • Salmon, G (2002) E-tivities: the key to active online learning. Kogan Page.
  • Stephenson, J. (Ed.) (2001) Teaching and Learning Online London: Kogan Page
  • Squires, D, Conole, G & Jacobs, G (2000) The Changing Face of Learning Technology, Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
  • Steeples, C & Jones, C (eds) (2001) Networked Learning: perspectives and issues, Springer Verlag

Also, what key websites would you recommend for use within the PGCLTHE programme aside from http://www.alt.ac.uk/; http://www.jisc.ac.uk/?

#pelc10: audiocast

Listen to the full podcast. The slides from my section are here, and the original/revised abstracts!

#pelc10 Plymouth E-Learning Debate

View more presentations from Bex Lewis.

Great conference ongoing in Plymouth, hope to put some more content up shortly, but meantime, follow the Tweetstream. We had a great debate earlier, above are my slides… (debate abstract)

Dave White, Keynote, #pelc10

David has worked in the overlapping space between education, technology and media for over 16 years. He co-manages Technology-Assisted Lifelong Learning (TALL), an elearning research and development group at theUniversity of Oxford.

At TALL he is responsible for the production and delivery of a wide range of online distance courses. The courses include philosophy, art, literature, economics, history and even nanotechnology. Over 1000 students based around the globe enrol on these each term.

David released some of the first data on ‘web 2.0’platforms which contained the type of diagrams that have ‘social’, ‘studying’ and ‘professional’ nestling alongside each other to highlight out how these boundaries are blurring. He has also researched the wild frontiers of Virtual Worlds and Massively Multiplayer Online games in the context of teaching and learning.

He is keen to see beyond the technology to the larger underlying trends that are emerging as society moves online, exploring the motivations and aspirations of students as they engage with the web and with each other. His musing on these subjects can be found on the TALL blog.

Recently David has been closely involved in the work of the HEFCE Online Learning Task Force, which has been set-up with the aims of maintaining and developing the position of UK higher education as a world leader in online learning.

Notes taken on my netbook

  • Technology and education, why we’re in the room… digital technology – just a fancy tool – is this a good enough framing for the discussion… or should we think about learning/pedagogy first?
  • Students in Second Life – philosophy discussion – moved from 3rd person to 1st person… – how many layers away is that from ‘real’? Early 1980s, computing started to appear in schools… his Dad moved from teaching RE, to teaching computing, because he was interested… asked him how teaching computing would happen.. his Dad said in future would just be part of everyday life… BBC ‘The Computer Programme’… (1982)
  • Culturally what has happened – we can now get computers in every colour… in many ways more important than what’s inside it…  The iPad – same to 1982 – just the latest technology for this year… the difference, in 1982 – was ‘a geek’ with authority, whereas iPad = a model in jeans… – mostly because of visibility of the web – who’s in space…
  • The Hierarchy of Digital Distractions.. to many, this is what technology actually is…  So many things are under the banned of ‘technology’…  if we’re not clear how we think, then others will tell us how to think!
  • Role of technology?
  • Disappearing into use; disrupting the status quo – can do both…
  • Desire: ‘Disappear (Want), Disrupt (Need) – most of us want the tech to disappear, don’t want to have to think about it, but maybe they need it to be a bit disruptive… We need to challenge students, why have we talked about ‘the student as consumer’ – when have we ever given them what they want…
  • Pedagogy – want to pass assessment, need to do group work/collaboration [difficult/messy]
  • Technology – to pass assessment – use VLE, Email, Content; Group work – blogging, social media, content – multiple points of feedback/need to be human beings… If being innovative, going to be disruptive and not necessarily easy to embed, otherwise wouldn’t be labelled as innovation…
  • Motivation – http://bit.ly.pi2qv – visitors, residents – most students/tutors, choose to engage/not engage for particular reasons and have their own strategies for getting through…
  • Bickering. Between those who want to stick with what they have, versus new tech – we argue too much – we need both & need to talk to each other constructively… it’s like talking about the internal combustion engine, rather than stepping back about where we’re trying to head… e.g. the phone – post-technical, culturally normalised (as has email) – the phone is the conversations we have on it, rather than the phone…
  • http://bit.ly/5mh790 – we should be involved early so we can influence the development so it’s useful for us… too often a tool-specific solution.. all moves to post-digital as they are culturally normalised…how many of you are players/innovators, how many pragmatists? Difficult.. Don’t get tied up with specific platforms, but recognise are somewhere in this flow… Need to talk to each other, not geeks being gatekeepers…
  • [Images, should put the origins in the base left corner...]
  • Think about where you sit on these issues…. Much of what we’re doing is mainstream – we need a good grasp on strategy, maybe even politics… maybe able to influence how education is moving forward as a whole…
  • Henry Ford, if he’d asked, people would have said they wanted faster horses… so do we give people what they want or pay lip service?
  • All tutors/teachers are also learners – should be less clear cut distinctions. Govt saying we should just listen to the student voice… IS our job to challenge…
  • Good to create some anxiety to make them think, but not anxiety re what room they are in – how much technology just causes anxiety?
  • Web contact/communication not content… online learning, find if more than 20-30 they start dropping out as want the contact.. get a better deal than f2f. Blurred boundaries as many are presented in both formats…
  • What’s the difference between education and training? Discussion not just eating content…
  • Don’t be afraid of the banal… we spend 80% of our lives … if it contributes to learning!
  • Twitter – content – merely a bridge to relationship building..
  • If you’re not teaching, you’re talking…
  • How do you recreate those conversations that you can best have down the pub? Best places – have someone centrally focused, dragging them out of their faculties, talking to each other – but innovations generally come from grass roots – if you can’t draw that out, the individual leaves, and the institution loses, we keep re innovating the same thing… really skilled thing to make that work as people are talking different languages – don’t sit in own silos assuming that we know what the others think…
  • Is it beginning to appear in strategies – started to realise that e-learning strategy shouldn’t be around the technology but about the communications strategies… may be difficult/delicate job, but will find there tends to be a technical solution for things… We need the cakes… v. important..
  • Any large institution has problem of separate kingdoms – in role – understand politics, look good at big meetings, but talk on a human level…
  • Lots of places thinking that we can solve by offering with ‘online learning’ – UK education still hugely recognised as leading – we are in a global environment…  Think reassured that education not about to be industrialised, and can maintain our essence…