Making Management #altc2011

First up, Dr Bex Lewis, with ‘Getting in on the Twitter Action? Using Twitter to build your professional network’.

University of Plymouth (Janice Gibbs, Neil Witt)

altc2011-wed 009

‘Learning Technologists’ is a TEQF – hangover… But money has gone!!
Learning Technologists: taken a long time to see past the technology/tied into ‘pedagogic problem to solve’ – here’s your solution.

Change in funding – leads to an opportunity to change the structure of the role. Hub & spoke models … Central team move from innovation by embedding.

Must take care with the wording use – if invite people to a Twitter/blogging/social media session – less likely to come than if you say come to to a session on ‘encouraging reflective learning amongst your students’.

Don’t disregard a technology because it doesn’t do 5% of what you want it to do just because you ‘have always done it this way’. Need to look at teaching design process.

Don’t tell the academics that ‘the VLE is dead’ … They are panicking about what they need to do next!! What may be ‘what everyone else does’ may not be sexy to learning technologist but to jobbing academics it’s still another thing to get hold of.

Go out and find the ‘not keen’ – don’t just go through the student unions. Convincing the skeptics makes for great. Staff & students – taken 2 years to convince of the value of learning technology.. Only now people coming to talk at programme design stage – now discuss/not imposed!

Virtual condom = IT often a barrier to others – need to use the right terminology.

Kent University – Steve Bailey/ Stephen Ogden

Moving from WebCT to Moodle (wanted open source, could keep on top of developments, rather than have changes forced upon them by companies buying each other out). Ensured that Learning Technology & ITS talking to each other.

Migration model – needed a process whether migrator would work without need for decision making processes (even if students sit all summer and do manually).

In moving data had to have intermediary stages to ensure that data was secure. Very carefully prepared the training programme to ensure that not overwhelmed … Timed to fit with what was needed at the time.

Lots of links to examples on the Crowdvine site, including simple file upload which bypasses the double file upload. In house developments – contributed back to the core community. Understand that the process is endless & ongoing.

See further resources for all papers on Crowdvine.

This blog entry was written live in session, with photos/headings added afterwards.

SITE IS MOVING SERVERS

Dear all

I am currently moving this site to a new host. The nameservers are resetting themselves, and hopefully it will change overnight, so I can refresh in the morning, but we’ll have to see. Meantime, be aware that it may suddenly switch to an empty WordPress space… the new materials will be here soon… The site itself is having bits & pieces of an overhaul done, and I plan to sort out the categories, and start to put together formal workshop offerings soon!

Bex

Change Happens

Great new video…

Thanks to @JohnnyLaird for bringing it to my attention.

University of Staffordshire, Change & Innovation, #pelc10

Undertaking – innovative stuff in a traditional institution

  • Most staff trying to be innovative, doing in isolation- not aware of top-level… how do we start to engage staff, understand how strategy is changing… Handout – resource basis,everything was coming from top-down and external influences, not taking on board internal.
  • Enable: portfolio management (strategy development, change management, organisational growth) – curriculum is growing, why is it just growing, how manage.why not culling?
  • Initiative (project) management – analysis, planning, implementation, review! Needed to be holistic in what was doing – P3M3 – mentioned by JISC, picked up by industry… Executive level strategy – focusing on traditional learners – campus learners, etc. not what their partners are doing… need to recognise that business is growing outside the traditional learner.
  • Impact, Business Case, Focus, Grants.. we need to stop doing this as it costs money, and impacting out curriculum, etc. Information was ring0fenced in course databases -info only online/the net… Projects running without direction – didn’t understand why they were doing something, lost sponsorship and going off in diff directions – project was trying to do too much… too much narrow focus – not getting the right people involved, ignoring funding…
  • Think where are you going? Enterprise architecture approach… (a tool that is difficult to communicate, so don’t discuss with others). Gives roadmap, overview and idea on how things will change… lots of info online – tends to be v. dry… Scoped to curriculum design & development. Models/maps, ideas of technologies needed to move forward…
  • Keep the staff engaged… have a history in institutions of people feeling imposed upon by central services or QAA, ensure they’re informed, and that they are consulted about thoughts/feelings/ideas… often difficult as each Faculty wants to do things their own way! Support rather than a control mechanism… communicate benefits from bottom up to senior management…  Global view – how do you ensure it goes across to other systems, thinking what is the best way forward fro everything else…
  • http://jiscenable.blogspot.com
  • Job to find out what people want and make it possible, get rid of barriers, get rid of the mundane, and can then focus on curriculum design, etc. rather than endless committees… Traditional teaching materials on the VLE, but think what you want to do with them…
  • Said “they must have this” – need to think about WHY they have it up there, and contextualising their PPTs, etc…
  • Creating systems until it becomes embedded in practice – too many people doing things in pockets, not scaleable – e.g. they’re so keen, drag out old hard drives, etc. – not sustainable, but how do you keep that innovation going… No initiative/closure/evaluation documentation… Encourage those pockets to talk to the right people… Manager of Elearning projects – doing projects without her knowing about them… that’s good, means is not ALL having to come from top down?!
  • Why does everybody feel that they have to run a pilot when one department already has? James hates the word project – what about initiative? Why do you think it’s not going to work in your Faculty? Lot of resistence, just need to deal with it sensitively, tend to talk perceptions re reality. Blogs heavily, including internal (anonymised) … whether it’s real or not, it’s a perception that exists! “This is what they’re telling me”…